MY PERSONAL MESSAGE to the “QUIT HATE MOVEMENT”.

        

          “HATE” is the MOST SELF DESTRUCTING emotion that results in MORE HARM in the long run  to the person who INDULGES in HATE of OTHERS than it AFFECTS his OBJECTS of HATE!

        Since this a SLOW POISON that weakens the OVERALL CHARACTER of that person to CONVERT HIM into an “ENTITY that is FULL of a “SELF& INTERNALLY  CREATED POISON POTION” that starts  CORRODING & PUSHING his own PSHYCHE towards HATING more & more “ OTHERS” who he starts disliking for some MINOR REASON or the OTHER and EVENTUALLY this HATE becomes an ALL – ENCOMPASSING emotion in his SELF that leaves him with NO LOVE or AFFECTION for any one and he BECOMES TOTALLY an AUTOMATON that can only HATE at the expense of all other and MORE POSITIVE & PRODUCTIVE Emotions like LOVE, RESPECT etc that normally ENDEAR a PERSON to OTHERS , where as his CONSTANT INDDULGENCE in “HATE-TALK” against others LEAVES many of his OWN EARLIER Friends to DESRET him –branding him a PYSCHO!

        SO just like CIGARETTE SMOKING is EXTREMELY HARMFUL / INJURIOUS to those who SMOKE, for those who PRACTICE “ HATE”,  this “POISON of HATE” too is EXTREMELY HARMFUL / INJURIOUS to thos who become ADDICTED to it!

MY Letter to the BANGALORE MIRROR  criticizing the EDIT PAGE ARTICLE “We are like this only” by ANUVAB PAL, BANGALORE  MIRROR, Dated February 21, 2018

FOLLOWING is the TEXT of the above mentioned ARTICLE:

WE ARE LIKE THIS ONLY

Bangalore Mirror Bureau | Updated: Feb 21, 2018, 08.49 AM IST

By: Anuvab Pal

Does something in our DNA propel us to game a system, any system? Perhaps a tiny atom of Nirav Modi lives in all of us, manifesting in things like breaking a traffic signal or jumping a queue

The question to ask in the midst of this Nirav Modi imbroglio is a bigger one: is there something in our DNA that propels us to do stuff like this? To which you say, ‘What? Are you saying a billion people are dishonest?’ Statistically speaking, unlikely. Although, perhaps, a tiny atom of Nirav Modi lives in all of us. It doesn’t manifest in a

Rs 3,600 crore LoU backed by no assets, but it does in things like breaking a traffic signal, or looking for ways to cut a queue, or avoiding a tiny tax. Ego, thinking, if there’s a way around a system, we’ll find it.

If one looks through the operations of most Indian companies, you’ll be hard pressed to find one where there isn’t some sort of manipulation. Just like if you look through every building society in Mumbai, almost all of them have some sort of litigation involving rule-breaking. Which begs the question — when ALL have broken the rules, perhaps they aren’t the outlier; perhaps the system is.

I once dropped a wallet in the second-class compartment of a train, and a homeless person sleeping on the platform ran after me to return it. Direct theft, breaking the law overtly as a crime, is not in our DNA, regardless of economic status, which makes foreigners wonder, “Whoa, look, that person has nothing to eat and he won’t steal. India is great.” Similarly violent crime; unlike South Africa and Brazil, rife with burglaries and house break-ins, our cities are relatively safe at night and people don’t go around shooting up schools. Where we do outdo nations though, is in the ingenious manoeuvring of systems. If a handful of shady entrepreneurs think they can take a public-sector bank for a ride because the public-sector banks’ internal systems are weak, that’s not viewed as a crime in our culture, but as business acumen. The same is true for the actual employees within the bank as well. In some circles, the Vijay Mallyas of the world are seen as people who’ve outsmarted a system, not broken it.

The argument isn’t that every Indian promoter wants to take money and never pay it back, but that all of us — from the person who wants to adjust a menu in a restaurant, to the person drinking and driving, to the person illegally extending their balcony — we all have that tiny sliver in our head that says, “Well, why not try and bend the rules. No harm in trying.”

Nobody knows what the actual facts are in the diamond merchants’ case, and whether the amount is Rs 11, 400 crore, or a lot less or more. Currently, the easy narrative the media can shout about is that a man has taken Rs 11,400 crore and run away. Nobody is asking simple questions like, if that was the plan, why not shut shop and leave with all the diamonds, rather than leave behind hundreds of jewellery stores filled with jewels and 2,200 employees? The knee-jerk reaction, and the idiotic one, is always to arrest everyone from the promoters’ cook to his barber, none of which will actually help recover the money. What is indisputable is that Nirav Modi noticed a loophole in the system, as perhaps did Mallya, by convincing a banker that funding an airline was a good thing, as did Harshad Mehta, or 2G spectrum allocators, or people getting coal licences, or Lalu Prasad’s ability to see revenue in cow fodder. Spotting where a rule can be bent is intrinsic to who we are — it’s a talent. All that varies is the scale — for diamond merchants, it is Rs 3,600 crore; for the guy that goes down a one-way illegally, it is avoiding a Rs 200 fine.

Beating the system feels like a small victory, and it doesn’t matter what the system is. This is why we wouldn’t survive for long in Sweden or Norway. Not because they are advanced, but that everything in the system functions so smoothly that rules don’t need to be broken — and that would bore us.

As an aftermath to this, lots of honest small entrepreneurs who’ve maybe taken loans and deviated from the system (staying true to their DNA) in very small ways will bear the brunt, unfairly, of this one giant manipulation. As will the middle manager at the bank who may have made a little adjustment from bank norms to help a unique customer. Suddenly, everyone will try and prove that we are moral, upright people, and these things are not in our system — and that nobody has ever made an undue ‘adjustment’ anywhere for anything. Perhaps, after scam after scam, we need to realise that these people aren’t one-time criminals, but giant versions of our DNA.

MY Letter to the BANGALORE MIRROR  criticizing the EDIT PAGE ARTICLE “We are like this only” by ANUVAB PAL, BANGALORE  MIRROR, Dated February 21, 2018

Dear Sir,

                      

                                 SUBJECT:  Apropos the Editorial Page Article  -  “We are like this only” by ANUVAB PAL, BANGALORE  MIRROR, Dated February 21, 2018

           

            

                        The Article “We are like this only” by ANUVAB PAL, BANGALORE MIRROR, Dated February 21, 2018 is one  that to BLATANTLY tries to  COVERUP the  CULPABILITY / Responsibility of Modi’s / BJP  Central Government AND Nirav Modi & his UNCLE Mehul Choksi ( Big MODI’S “Hamare Mehul Bhai”!) in the MAMMOTH Rs. 11,400/- crores ( or even BIGGER?) P N B scam!

             

                          The entire THREAD / PLOT in the article “We are like this only” by ANUVAB PAL, BANGALORE MIRROR, Dated February 21, 2018 - is directed towards psychologically affecting the READER to form an OPINION that “All of us Indians have a SIMILAR habit ( He calls it D N A) of CHEATING / CUTTING Corners at Govt regulations / rules AND so he CLEVERLY puts across the MESSAGE IN BETWEEN HIS LINES – “why BLAME only Nirav Modi & his UNCLE Mehul Choksi” for  SUCCESFULLY DOING the  SAME “CHEATING / CUTTING Corners of Govt regulations / rules”!!!!!

           

                     It is truly MIND BOGGLING to note as to HOW & WHAT this writer is ATTEMPTING to accomplish! He is EQUATING a minor TRAFIC OFFENCE, a MINOR BBMP Plan Deviation and so on and so forth and similar minor, say - “CRIMES” with the GARGANTUAN 11,400 Cr ( or may be 21,000/- Crores) SWINDLE  by Nirav Modi & his UNCLE Mehul Choksi ( Big MODI’S “Hamare Mehul Bhai”!)

            

                                 From my above observations it is EASY to surmise that either this writer Anuvab Pal was trying to be “too CLEVER by HALF” to appear distinctly DIFFERENT from other CRITIQUES by other writers on this SHOCKING SWINDLE by a few, due to their CONTACTS / CONNECTIONS with the P N B top Brass & POLITICAL BIG WIGS; (Big MODI’s declaration “Hamare MEHUL BHAI” for Mehul Choksi - uncle of NIRAV MODI,  showing how INFLUENCE PEDDALING is RAMPANT now!)

            

                                OR , this ARTICLE is CLEARLY an ARTICLE that has been COMMISIONED by the Central Government ( as many other ARTICLES have started appearing in various Govt. Controlled Websites & News Papers?)and this writer is CULPABLE of TAKING COMMISION for writing such articles that provide, in a manner of speaking, “ COVER UP FIRE” to the Culprits so that they may escape LAW’s NET!

            

                                 I now would like to KNOW whether like the “TIMES NOW” –TV news Channel, Bangalore Mirror too has been commandeered by your owners / boards to toe the line of Modi / BJP Govt and to PROTECT their interests / ideology / policies at any cost both NATIONALLY & even in KARNATAKA,{ and simultaneously be DEAD against their OPPOSITION PARTIES (Read CONGRESS) again, both NATIONALLY and in KARNATAKA}, for the SAKE of getting some equally GARGANTUAN PATRONAGE that is  similar in value to their SCAMS you are require to put under the carpet?

           

                            I do EXPECT that this letter of mine will duly find a place in your “Talk Back” column, just like the MANY and REGULAR ANTI-CONGRESS letters that find their place in the same column and also LIKE the ANTI-CONGRESS NEWS REPORTS that have become a DAILY AFFAIR in your tabloid.     

                   Shahabuddin Nadeem,

 DATE : January 05, 2017

My BLOG on the PERNICIOUS TRIPLE TALAQ BILL brought CONSPIRATORIALLY by the Present Sanghi Dispensation at the center

@siddaramaiah So KARNATAKA Cong. Govt wl OPPOSE th PERNICIOUS-"Tripple Talaq Bill"tht CRIMINALISES Muslim MEN&ws passed in LOKSABHA by COMMUNAL BJP-In Karnataka ONLY(?)whr CONGRESS wants MUSLIM VOTES?but @Center it will PLAY a "We want it but with amendments"GAME?We r NOT FOOLS!

@rssurjewala So KARNATAKA Cong. Govt wl OPPOSE th PERNICIOUS-"Tripple Talaq Bill"tht CRIMINALISES Muslim MEN&ws passed in LOKSABHA by COMMUNAL BJP-In Karnataka ONLY(?)whr CONGRESS wants MUSLIM VOTES?but @Center it will PLAY a "We want it but with amendments"GAME?We r NOT FOOLS! pic.twitter.com/8XwLhdKf57

@OfficeOfRG So KARNATAKA Cong. Govt wl OPPOSE th PERNICIOUS-"Tripple Talaq Bill"tht CRIMINALISES Muslim MEN&ws passed in LOKSABHA by COMMUNAL BJP-In Karnataka ONLY(?)whr CONGRESS wants MUSLIM VOTES?but @Center it will PLAY a "We want it but with amendments"GAME?We r NOT FOOLS!

@ManishTewari So KARNATAKA Cong. Govt wl OPPOSE th PERNICIOUS-"Tripple Talaq Bill"tht CRIMINALISES Muslim MEN&ws passed in LOKSABHA by COMMUNAL BJP-In Karnataka ONLY(?)whr CONGRESS wants MUSLIM VOTES?but @Center it will PLAY a "We want it but with amendments"GAME?We r NOT FOOLS!

@siddaramaiah I'm a Muslim woman&this triple talaq bill is not wht I fought fr-RANA SAFVI-SPOT ON!

YES BILL is "OPEN WARRANT"issued against MUSLIM MEN"in PRETEXT of HELPING MUSLIM WOMEN&goes against SEVERAL CONSTITUTIONAL/FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

https://www.dailyo.in/voices/triple-talaq-bill-muslim-women-bjp-uniform-civil-code-parliament-supreme-court/story/1/21436.html … via @dailyo_

@rssurjewala I'm a Muslim woman&this triple talaq bill is not wht I fought fr-RANA SAFVI-SPOT ON!YES BILL is"OPEN WARRANT"issued against MUSLIM MEN"in PRETEXT of HELPING MUSLIM WOMEN&goes against SEVERAL CONSTITUTIONAL/FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS https://www.dailyo.in/voices/triple-talaq-bill-muslim-women-bjp-uniform-civil-code-parliament-supreme-court/story/1/21436.html … … via @dailyo_

@ManishTewari I'm aMuslim woman&ths triple talaq bill's nt wht I fought fr-RANA SAFVI-SPOT ON!

s ths BILL is"OPEN WARRANT"issued against MUSLIM MEN"on PRETEXT of HELPING MUSLIM WOMEN&goes against SEVERAL FUNDAMENTAL Constitutional RIGHTS  

https://www.dailyo.in/voices/triple-talaq-bill-muslim-women-bjp-uniform-civil-code-parliament-supreme-court/story/1/21436.html … via @dailyo

@OfficeOfRG I'm aMuslim woman&ths triple talaq bill's not wht I fought fr-RANA SAFVI-SPOT ON! YES ths BILL is"OPEN WARRANT"issued against MUSLIM MEN"on PRETEXT of HELPING MUSLIM WOMEN&goes against SEVERAL FUNDAMENTAL Constitutional RIGHTS https://www.dailyo.in/voices/triple-talaq-bill-muslim-women-bjp-uniform-civil-code-parliament-supreme-court/story/1/21436.html … … via @dailyo

 FACE BOOK POST

This VERY POORLY DRAFTED BILL, that seems to have been DRAFTED in  GREAT HURRY without ANY KIND of CONSULT IONS with the PARTIES it is going to AFFECT purely with POLITICAL INTENTIONS, Mindlessly Criminalises act of  Pronouncing  “INSTANT Tripple Talaq and Imposes JAIL TERM of 3 years! But the FUNNY aspect of this THOROUGHLY JUNK BILL with CONTRADICTIONS & many MINDLESS hyperboles, Pronouncement of “INSTANT Tripple Talaq” by Muslim Men as a “RAPID means of Instant Divorce” has been already  MADE VOID by Supreme Court just 3 Months back in AUGUST-2017!( Though the Supreme Court has RETAINED as a VALID means of Divorce for Muslim Men and Women ;Tripple-Talaq-e-Ahsan & Tripple Talaq-e-Hasan, that is  Formal Divorce CARRIED out FORMALLY over Three or MORE MONTHS that includes PERSUASION by elders to reconsider the Decision etc)

So the  Neo-Sanghi-Fascist-Bharashtachar-Jumla-Party Government  has brought this horrendously INCOMPETENT / JUNK bill  CLEARLY with MALAFIDE Intentions & it is meant ONLY to  Harass Muslim MEN& not for helping Muslim Women in their Marital Strife!

 In fact this bill FOOLISHLY takes MARITAL STRIFE between Muslim Men & Women into a LEGAL QUAGMIRE of  ARREST of the MAN & his imprisonment  for 3 YEARS without  OFFERING any SUCCOUR from this SILLY GOVERNMENT to the WOMAN who will then be LEFT to FEND for HERSELF and  her CHILDREN due to this POORLY and MADLY drafted  UNCONSTITUTIONAL bill as it VIOLATES many of the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS of the Muslim Men as EXPLICITLY Guaranteed in the Indian Constitution and WILL not STAND SCRUTINY by the SUPREME COURT and will be THROWN OUT as a NULL & VOID LAW that CLASHES and GOES AGAINST  innumerable FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ( to EQUALITY before LAW) EXPLICITLY Guaranteed in the Indian Constitution !     

 FACE BOOK POST

PRECISELY, the REAL&SORDID MOTIVE of this"Bharashtachar-JUMLABAZ FEKU'S-U’Turn-Adani, Ambani’s- Sales Center-EVM-VVPAT-Rigging / Tampering-NEO- SANGHI-FASCIST-MAFIOSI-LUMPENS-GOONS-Party" is ONLY to HARASS MUSLIM MEN using this (UNLAWFUL)-LEGAL TOOL in the hands of a POLICE FORCE that has shown TOTAL BIAS against Muslims in all the COW-PROTECTION- VIGILANTE LYNCHING cases and has arrested only the Muslim VICTIMS of LYNCHINGS & not the Hindu so called Gau-Rakshak LUMPEN-GOONS and MURDERERS!

AND so Muslim Organisations should APPROACH Supreme Court immediately if this gets PASSED EVEN in the RAJYA SABHA also (through a CONSPIRACY of SILENCE by CONGRESS and OTHER Opposition Parties like the Trinamool Congress, BJD etc) AND get it declared NULL and VOID as early as possible by a CONSTITUTION BENCH since this BILL is BLATANTLY against MANY FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS guaranteed in the CONSTITUTION that BAR any kind of DISCRIMINATION on GROUNDS of Religion, race, caste , language AND also tries to CONVERT a CIVIL matter concerning MUSLIM PERSONAL LAW in to "CRIMINALITY? by equating "pronouncement of INSTANT TRIPPLE TALAQ" as a CRIME that will entail not one, or, two but FULL THREE YEARS of IMPRISONMENT and CONSPIRATORIALLY this FASCIST government has declared this CIVIL OFFENCE of "pronouncement of INSTANT TRIPPLE TALAQ"  that has already been DECLARED as VOID by a SUPREME COURT BENCH as a COGNISABLE as well as NON-BAILABLE OFFENCE – under which LAW / CLAUSE, a POLICE MAN can arrest a person ON HIS OWN DISCRETION or on COMPLAINT from any TOM , DICK, and HARRY and send him to JAIL through an ORDER of a LOCAL magistrate!!

https://www.facebook.com/shahabuddin.nadeem.7/posts/1754335797930934

Article by RANA SAFVI- On- this PERNICIOUS Bill on Triple Talaq : She was one of the  Women Warriors  who fought for getting SUPREME COURT DECLARE Instant  Triple talaq ( Talaq-e-Biddat)  as VOID & Unconstitutional

I'm a Muslim woman and this triple talaq bill is not what I fought for
At a time when Muslim men are already living in fear, one more law would be added to harass, jail and demonise them.
VOICES | 5-minute read | 29-12-2017
Rana SafviRANA SAFVI @iamrana
5.78k
Total Shares

On December 28, a bill criminalising triple talaq was rushed through the lower house of Parliament and passed without much opposition. By late evening, the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017 (triple talaq bill) had been passed.

In fact, the most vocal opposition was by AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi. It was opposed by MPs from the RJD, AIMIM, BJD, AIADMK and All India Muslim League. 

They called it arbitrary and flawed.

So, why was I, who fought tooth and nail to get the instant triple talaq declared null and void by Parliament, unhappy? How did I find myself on the side of the very people I had fought against in many TV studios over instant triple talaq?

We had all rejoiced when the Supreme Court declared the practice of triple talaq as unconstitutional. That is how it should be. It was a practise that had no basis in either Quranic or constitutional law. I had rejoiced as an Indian, as a woman and as a Muslim that Indian Muslim women would get justice and not be at the mercy of their husbands.

In Islam, marriage is a civil contract and not an eternal bond which can’t be dissolved. The Quran has prescribed talaq, but to be pronounced by the husband over a period of three months with attempts at reconciliation and arbitration. The woman can ask for "khula" which is a more complicated process and I had argued for a model nikahnama whereby both men and women have equal rights in matters of divorce. Matters of custody, maintenance etc, can also be pre-decided as the nikahnama serves as a pre-nuptial agreement.

taaa_122917012801.jpg

First of all, let me clarify that it was talaq-e-biddat or instant triple talaq (pronounced in one sitting) that is under discussion. This was often given in anger, in an abnormal state and many a times regretted. Now that the Supreme Court had made it illegal, it doesn’t hold. The woman who has had her husband say this is not divorced.

The reason for bringing this bill in Parliament was that despite that judgment it had not acted as a deterrent.

In fact, law and justice minister Ravi Shankar Prasad even said that despite the Supreme Court setting aside talaq-e-biddat, it is seen that it has not worked as any deterrent.

While fighting to get the instant triple talaq declared illegal and unconstitutional, I had argued as an Indian protected by the Constitution, as a woman who demands and expects equality, as a practising Muslim who is aware of her own rights as given by the Quran. Once again, I question the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017 on the same basis.

I am neither a lawyer nor someone who has studied law. But as a responsible citizen of a democratic country, I have the right to question my government. My basic question is why was something that was already declared null and void sought to be criminalised? In fact, the Supreme Court itself did not ask this to be made into a law.

Now to the question - why am I worried?

This bill, if passed into a law, prescribes a punishment of a fine and imprisonment up to three years for the husband. It is also cognisable and non-bailable.

Let’s understand what cognisable means: it means that a policeman does not need a warrant to arrest the accused. It also means that the complaint can be made by not just the victim, in this case the wife, but by others too. In fact, any information against the husband can lead to an arrest.

Care to think how it will be misused? Anyone with an axe to grind can get a Muslim man jailed. The way our courts are over burdened it may be a long time before justice prevails. As Indian Union Muslim League MP, ET Muhammed Basheer, said it was “taking a gun to kill a mosquito”. There will definitely be more blood and damage in the house than that of a tiny mosquito.

The other provisions of the bill are subsistence allowance for the wife and dependent children and custody of children to the wife. Many argued last evening that how can a man who is in jail provide for his family or fight a custody battle for his children since no court will grant custody of children to a man in jail? A woman who sought to save her marriage by ensuring that instant triple talaq is illegal is not being served justice if her husband can be thrown into jail on a cognisable and non-bailable warrant. Just imagine her life. Imagine the life of her children. And to top it all she’s still married to him. Since the instant triple talaq has already been declared illegal she can’t even remarry after the iddat or waiting period.

This is a hasty bill, not well thought out and, of course, not well-drafted.

What was the hurry? Why was no member of the community that this bill was aimed at consulted? Neither the BMMA (Bhartiya Muslim Mahila Andolan) or Bebaak Collective, both Muslim women groups which had fought against instant triple talaq in the courts, were consulted. And this is why I'm worried.

In a climate where Muslim men are already living in the fear of being lynched for being perceived as cow smugglers, eating or storing beef, for "love jihad" etc, one more law could be added to harass, jail and demonise them.

"Shameful display of brute force passing the TT Bill turning muslim husbands into criminals , this is not what we fought for in the Supreme Court of India

— indira jaising (@IJaising) December 28, 2017"

Just as noted lawyer Indira Jaising, who too fought for making instant triple talaq illegal, tweeted, this is not at all what we fought for in the Supreme Court of India.

I'm a Muslim woman&this triple talaq bill is not wht I fought for-RANA SAFVI-SPOT ON!

YES this BILL is an"OPEN WARRANT"issued against MUSLIM MEN"on PRETEXT of HELPING MUSLIM WOMEN&goes against SEVERAL FUNDAMENTAL Constitutional RIGHTS  

https://www.dailyo.in/voices/triple-talaq-bill-muslim-women-bjp-uniform-civil-code-parliament-supreme-court/story/1/21436.html … via @dailyo_