DATE : January 05, 2017
My BLOG on the PERNICIOUS TRIPLE TALAQ BILL brought CONSPIRATORIALLY by the Present Sanghi Dispensation at the center
@siddaramaiah So KARNATAKA Cong. Govt wl OPPOSE th
PERNICIOUS-"Tripple Talaq Bill"tht CRIMINALISES Muslim MEN&ws
passed in LOKSABHA by COMMUNAL BJP-In Karnataka ONLY(?)whr CONGRESS wants
MUSLIM VOTES?but @Center it will PLAY a "We want it but with
amendments"GAME?We r NOT FOOLS!
@rssurjewala So KARNATAKA Cong. Govt wl OPPOSE th
PERNICIOUS-"Tripple Talaq Bill"tht CRIMINALISES Muslim MEN&ws
passed in LOKSABHA by COMMUNAL BJP-In Karnataka ONLY(?)whr CONGRESS wants
MUSLIM VOTES?but @Center it will PLAY a "We want it but with amendments"GAME?We r NOT
FOOLS! pic.twitter.com/8XwLhdKf57
@OfficeOfRG So KARNATAKA Cong. Govt wl OPPOSE th
PERNICIOUS-"Tripple Talaq Bill"tht CRIMINALISES Muslim MEN&ws
passed in LOKSABHA by COMMUNAL BJP-In Karnataka ONLY(?)whr CONGRESS wants
MUSLIM VOTES?but @Center it will PLAY a "We want it but with amendments"GAME?We r NOT
FOOLS!
@ManishTewari So KARNATAKA Cong. Govt wl OPPOSE th
PERNICIOUS-"Tripple Talaq Bill"tht CRIMINALISES Muslim MEN&ws
passed in LOKSABHA by COMMUNAL BJP-In Karnataka ONLY(?)whr CONGRESS wants
MUSLIM VOTES?but @Center it will PLAY a "We want it but with amendments"GAME?We r NOT
FOOLS!
@siddaramaiah I'm a
Muslim woman&this triple talaq bill is not wht I fought fr-RANA SAFVI-SPOT
ON!
YES BILL is "OPEN
WARRANT"issued against MUSLIM MEN"in PRETEXT of HELPING MUSLIM
WOMEN&goes against SEVERAL CONSTITUTIONAL/FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
https://www.dailyo.in/voices/triple-talaq-bill-muslim-women-bjp-uniform-civil-code-parliament-supreme-court/story/1/21436.html
… via @dailyo_
@rssurjewala I'm a Muslim woman&this triple talaq bill is not wht I fought
fr-RANA SAFVI-SPOT ON!YES BILL is"OPEN WARRANT"issued against MUSLIM
MEN"in PRETEXT of HELPING MUSLIM WOMEN&goes against SEVERAL
CONSTITUTIONAL/FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
https://www.dailyo.in/voices/triple-talaq-bill-muslim-women-bjp-uniform-civil-code-parliament-supreme-court/story/1/21436.html
… … via @dailyo_
@ManishTewari I'm
aMuslim woman&ths triple talaq bill's nt wht I fought fr-RANA SAFVI-SPOT
ON!
s ths BILL
is"OPEN WARRANT"issued against MUSLIM MEN"on PRETEXT of HELPING
MUSLIM WOMEN&goes against SEVERAL FUNDAMENTAL Constitutional RIGHTS
https://www.dailyo.in/voices/triple-talaq-bill-muslim-women-bjp-uniform-civil-code-parliament-supreme-court/story/1/21436.html
… via @dailyo
@OfficeOfRG I'm
aMuslim woman&ths triple talaq bill's not wht I fought fr-RANA SAFVI-SPOT
ON! YES ths BILL is"OPEN WARRANT"issued against MUSLIM MEN"on
PRETEXT of HELPING MUSLIM WOMEN&goes against SEVERAL FUNDAMENTAL
Constitutional RIGHTS https://www.dailyo.in/voices/triple-talaq-bill-muslim-women-bjp-uniform-civil-code-parliament-supreme-court/story/1/21436.html … …
via @dailyo
This
VERY POORLY DRAFTED BILL, that seems to have been DRAFTED in GREAT HURRY without ANY KIND of CONSULT IONS with the PARTIES it is going to AFFECT purely with POLITICAL INTENTIONS,
Mindlessly Criminalises act of
Pronouncing “INSTANT Tripple
Talaq and Imposes JAIL TERM of 3 years! But the FUNNY aspect of this THOROUGHLY JUNK BILL with CONTRADICTIONS & many MINDLESS hyperboles, Pronouncement of “INSTANT
Tripple Talaq” by Muslim Men as a “RAPID means of Instant Divorce” has been
already MADE VOID by Supreme Court just
3 Months back in AUGUST-2017!( Though the Supreme Court has RETAINED as a VALID
means of Divorce for Muslim Men and Women ;Tripple-Talaq-e-Ahsan & Tripple
Talaq-e-Hasan, that is Formal Divorce
CARRIED out FORMALLY over Three or MORE MONTHS that includes PERSUASION by
elders to reconsider the Decision etc)
So
the Neo-Sanghi-Fascist-Bharashtachar-Jumla-Party
Government has brought this horrendously
INCOMPETENT / JUNK bill CLEARLY with
MALAFIDE Intentions & it is meant ONLY to Harass Muslim MEN& not for helping Muslim
Women in their Marital Strife!
In fact this bill FOOLISHLY takes MARITAL
STRIFE between Muslim Men & Women into a LEGAL QUAGMIRE of ARREST of the MAN & his imprisonment for 3 YEARS without OFFERING any SUCCOUR from this SILLY
GOVERNMENT to the WOMAN who will then be LEFT to FEND for HERSELF and her CHILDREN due to this POORLY and MADLY
drafted UNCONSTITUTIONAL bill as it
VIOLATES many of the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS of the Muslim Men as EXPLICITLY
Guaranteed in the Indian Constitution and WILL not STAND SCRUTINY by the
SUPREME COURT and will be THROWN OUT as a NULL & VOID LAW that CLASHES and
GOES AGAINST innumerable FUNDAMENTAL
RIGHTS ( to EQUALITY before LAW) EXPLICITLY Guaranteed in the Indian
Constitution !
PRECISELY, the REAL&SORDID
MOTIVE of this"Bharashtachar-JUMLABAZ FEKU'S-U’Turn-Adani, Ambani’s- Sales
Center-EVM-VVPAT-Rigging / Tampering-NEO-
SANGHI-FASCIST-MAFIOSI-LUMPENS-GOONS-Party" is ONLY to HARASS MUSLIM MEN
using this (UNLAWFUL)-LEGAL TOOL in the hands of a POLICE FORCE that has shown
TOTAL BIAS against Muslims in all the COW-PROTECTION- VIGILANTE LYNCHING cases
and has arrested only the Muslim VICTIMS of LYNCHINGS & not the Hindu so
called Gau-Rakshak LUMPEN-GOONS and MURDERERS!
AND so Muslim Organisations should
APPROACH Supreme Court immediately if this gets PASSED EVEN in the RAJYA SABHA
also (through a CONSPIRACY of SILENCE by CONGRESS and OTHER Opposition Parties
like the Trinamool Congress, BJD etc) AND get it declared NULL and VOID as
early as possible by a CONSTITUTION BENCH since this BILL is BLATANTLY against
MANY FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS guaranteed in the CONSTITUTION that BAR any kind of
DISCRIMINATION on GROUNDS of Religion, race, caste , language AND also tries to
CONVERT a CIVIL matter concerning MUSLIM PERSONAL LAW in to "CRIMINALITY?
by equating "pronouncement of INSTANT TRIPPLE TALAQ" as a CRIME that
will entail not one, or, two but FULL THREE YEARS of IMPRISONMENT and
CONSPIRATORIALLY this FASCIST government has declared this CIVIL OFFENCE of "pronouncement
of INSTANT TRIPPLE TALAQ" that has
already been DECLARED as VOID by a SUPREME COURT BENCH as a COGNISABLE as well
as NON-BAILABLE OFFENCE – under which LAW / CLAUSE, a POLICE MAN can arrest a
person ON HIS OWN DISCRETION or on COMPLAINT from any TOM , DICK, and HARRY and
send him to JAIL through an ORDER of a LOCAL magistrate!!
https://www.facebook.com/shahabuddin.nadeem.7/posts/1754335797930934
Article by RANA SAFVI-
On- this PERNICIOUS Bill on Triple Talaq : She was one of the Women Warriors who fought for getting SUPREME COURT DECLARE Instant Triple talaq ( Talaq-e-Biddat) as VOID & Unconstitutional
I'm a Muslim woman and this triple talaq bill is not what I
fought for
At a time when Muslim men are already living in fear, one more law would be added to harass, jail and demonise them.
VOICES | 5-minute read | 29-12-2017
Rana SafviRANA SAFVI @iamrana
5.78k
Total Shares
At a time when Muslim men are already living in fear, one more law would be added to harass, jail and demonise them.
VOICES | 5-minute read | 29-12-2017
Rana SafviRANA SAFVI @iamrana
5.78k
Total Shares
On December 28, a bill criminalising triple talaq was rushed through the lower
house of Parliament and passed without much opposition. By late evening, the
Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017 (triple talaq bill)
had been passed.
In fact, the most vocal opposition was by AIMIM president
Asaduddin Owaisi. It was opposed by MPs from the RJD, AIMIM, BJD, AIADMK and
All India Muslim League.
They called it arbitrary and flawed.
So, why was I, who fought tooth and nail to get the instant
triple talaq declared null and void by Parliament, unhappy? How did I find
myself on the side of the very people I had fought against in many TV studios
over instant triple talaq?
We had all rejoiced when the Supreme Court declared the practice
of triple talaq as unconstitutional. That is how it should be. It was a
practise that had no basis in either Quranic or constitutional law. I had
rejoiced as an Indian, as a woman and as a Muslim that Indian Muslim women
would get justice and not be at the mercy of their husbands.
In Islam, marriage is a civil contract and not an eternal bond
which can’t be dissolved. The Quran has prescribed talaq, but to be pronounced
by the husband over a period of three months with attempts at reconciliation
and arbitration. The woman can ask for "khula" which is a more
complicated process and I had argued for a model nikahnama whereby both men and
women have equal rights in matters of divorce. Matters of custody, maintenance
etc, can also be pre-decided as the nikahnama serves as a pre-nuptial
agreement.
taaa_122917012801.jpg
First of all, let me clarify that it was talaq-e-biddat or
instant triple talaq (pronounced in one sitting) that is under discussion. This
was often given in anger, in an abnormal state and many a times regretted. Now
that the Supreme Court had made it illegal, it doesn’t hold. The woman who has
had her husband say this is not divorced.
The reason for bringing this bill in Parliament was that despite
that judgment it had not acted as a deterrent.
In fact, law and justice minister Ravi Shankar Prasad even said
that despite the Supreme Court setting aside talaq-e-biddat, it is seen that it
has not worked as any deterrent.
While fighting to get the instant triple talaq declared illegal
and unconstitutional, I had argued as an Indian protected by the Constitution,
as a woman who demands and expects equality, as a practising Muslim who is
aware of her own rights as given by the Quran. Once again, I question the
Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017 on the same basis.
I am neither a lawyer nor someone who has studied law. But as a
responsible citizen of a democratic country, I have the right to question my
government. My basic question is why was something that was already declared
null and void sought to be criminalised? In fact, the Supreme Court itself did
not ask this to be made into a law.
Now to the question - why am I worried?
This bill, if passed into a law, prescribes a punishment of a
fine and imprisonment up to three years for the husband. It is also cognisable
and non-bailable.
Let’s understand what cognisable means: it means that a
policeman does not need a warrant to arrest the accused. It also means that the
complaint can be made by not just the victim, in this case the wife, but by
others too. In fact, any information against the husband can lead to an arrest.
Care to think how it will be misused? Anyone with an axe to
grind can get a Muslim man jailed. The way our courts are over burdened it may
be a long time before justice prevails. As Indian Union Muslim League MP, ET
Muhammed Basheer, said it was “taking a gun to kill a mosquito”. There will
definitely be more blood and damage in the house than that of a tiny mosquito.
The other provisions of the bill are subsistence allowance for
the wife and dependent children and custody of children to the wife. Many
argued last evening that how can a man who is in jail provide for his family or
fight a custody battle for his children since no court will grant custody of
children to a man in jail? A woman who sought to save her marriage by ensuring
that instant triple talaq is illegal is not being served justice if her husband
can be thrown into jail on a cognisable and non-bailable warrant. Just imagine
her life. Imagine the life of her children. And to top it all she’s still
married to him. Since the instant triple talaq has already been declared
illegal she can’t even remarry after the iddat or waiting period.
This is a hasty bill, not well thought out and, of course, not
well-drafted.
What was the hurry? Why was no member of the community that this
bill was aimed at consulted? Neither the BMMA (Bhartiya Muslim Mahila Andolan)
or Bebaak Collective, both Muslim women groups which had fought against instant
triple talaq in the courts, were consulted. And this is why I'm worried.
In a climate where Muslim men are already living in the fear of
being lynched for being perceived as cow smugglers, eating or storing beef, for
"love jihad" etc, one more law could be added to harass, jail and
demonise them.
"Shameful display of brute force passing the TT Bill turning
muslim husbands into criminals , this is not what we fought for in the Supreme
Court of India
— indira jaising (@IJaising) December 28, 2017"
Just as noted lawyer Indira Jaising, who too fought for making instant triple talaq illegal, tweeted, this is not at all what we fought for in the Supreme Court of India.
I'm a Muslim
woman&this triple talaq bill is not wht I fought for-RANA SAFVI-SPOT ON!
YES this BILL is
an"OPEN WARRANT"issued against MUSLIM MEN"on PRETEXT of HELPING
MUSLIM WOMEN&goes against SEVERAL FUNDAMENTAL Constitutional RIGHTS
https://www.dailyo.in/voices/triple-talaq-bill-muslim-women-bjp-uniform-civil-code-parliament-supreme-court/story/1/21436.html
… via @dailyo_